Threat Timeline
The mandate isn't conservative. It's calibrated.
<1%
2%
12%
NIST MANDATE
50%
88%
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
At the Dec 2030 mandate deadline, the probability of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer is ~12%. You don't wait until 50%. That window is 2032, and harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks are already running.
Store Now, Break Later
The risk nobody else quantifies.
Adversaries don't need a quantum computer today. They store your encrypted data now (DB backups, archives, TLS sessions) and decrypt it when the hardware arrives. Most of this exposure is data at rest, not network traffic. We take your cryptographic inventory and rank every asset by how long it remains vulnerable. Prospective risk, not detection theater.
What we measure
How sensitive is the data × how exposed is it × how vulnerable is the cryptography × how long until quantum computers can break it
Scores = prospective exposure, not evidence of active attack.
Time window derived from published quantum computing forecasts (midpoint 2032).
Competitive landscape
Zero.
No other vendor quantifies this specific risk.
Latin America
Latin America built its financial infrastructure on cryptography that quantum computers will break.
Based in Costa Rica. Independent infrastructure, no cloud provider lock-in, no US data jurisdiction. IBM quantum hardware verified from outside the US regulatory envelope.
No regional firm runs this test
Every post-quantum assessment available to LATAM firms comes from US or EU vendors. None of them operate IBM quantum hardware. None run actual attack circuits against your cryptography.
The storage is already happening
Adversaries are storing encrypted data today to decrypt when quantum hardware matures. This is not theoretical. It is the standard threat model for regulated industries. The exposure clock started before the migration conversation did.
Regulation follows NIST, and NIST moved
SUGEF, SFC, CNBV, BACEN, and CMF follow international standards. NIST finalized post-quantum standards in 2024. The US Executive Order of June 2026 triggers LATAM regulatory alignment. The window to get ahead is measured in months.
Roadmaps are not protection
Large consulting firms sell theoretical roadmaps and strategy decks. A phased plan on paper is not protection against stored-data attacks. You need working migration on real infrastructure now, not a presentation for next fiscal year.
Markets
Where the exposure is greatest
Every sector below runs cryptography that quantum hardware will eventually threaten. The question is whether they measure it before or after the window closes.
The Process
01 ATTACK
Run Shor-ECDLP circuits on real IBM quantum hardware against your cryptographic assets. Find what actually breaks, not what threat models predict.
02 MEASURE
Test every result against pre-registered criteria before it enters your report. If the data says nothing broke, we say so.
03 MIGRATE
Build a migration plan scoped to what the evidence shows is at risk. Phased rollout with rollback gates. You get a Crypto-SBOM, not a slide deck.
04 VERIFY
Independent review before anything ships. Every deliverable is a standalone artifact you own, no platform, no subscription, no vendor lock-in.
Counterfoil
The stub you keep when the agent acts.
When our tooling inventories, migrates, or validates your cryptography, Counterfoil writes a signed, hash-chained, independently verifiable record of every step. The evidence file your auditor asks for, before they ask for it.
The EU AI Act requires automatic logging for high-risk systems from August 2026. Counterfoil exceeds that floor: not just logged, but tamper-evident, and re-verifiable without trusting us.
The Suite
01 · DISCOVER
Algorithm Selector
LIVE TOOLPick the right post-quantum algorithm for your use case. Deterministic routing through NIST standards (FIPS 203/204/205). Every recommendation traceable. Free tool.Open →
Cryptographic Inventory
APIScan your codebase and find every cryptographic asset: keys, certificates, protocols, libraries. Output: a machine-readable inventory with quantum risk scores.
02 · BENCHMARK
Quantum Key Provenance
API · PDFSigned certificate proving your key material came from real quantum hardware measurement, not a pseudo-random generator. Offline-verifiable. No secrets needed to verify.
03 · MIGRATE
Migration Tracker
LIVE TOOLTrack your post-quantum migration against regulatory deadlines. Multi-tenant, hash-chained audit trail, PDF export. Pre-loaded with US Executive Order timelines.Open →
Crypto-Agility Planner
APIMap your cryptographic dependencies, plan phased migration (classical → hybrid → post-quantum), and roll back any phase if needed.
Key Management
APIPost-quantum key management compatible with AWS KMS. Supports ML-KEM and ML-DSA at all security levels. AES-256-GCM encryption at rest.
04 · COMPLY
Regional Compliance Bridge
API · PDFMap NIST post-quantum standards to LATAM regulators: SUGEF, SFC, CNBV, BACEN, CMF. Deterministic knowledge base, never LLM-generated. Spanish, Portuguese, English output.
Secure Agent Sandbox
APIIsolated environment for running AI agents: scope firewall, append-only audit, post-quantum key protection at rest, and automatic shutdown if boundaries are crossed. Post-quantum channel encryption and signed model manifests are on the roadmap.
Counterfoil
FLAGSHIPThe evidence layer over the whole suite. Every automated step, inventory, migration, or validation, leaves a signed, hash-chained, independently verifiable receipt. The record your auditor asks for, before they ask for it.Open →
05 · EXTEND
Store-Now-Break-Later Risk Score
API · PDFRank every cryptographic asset by how long it remains vulnerable to future quantum decryption. Prospective risk scoring, not detection of active attacks.
Quantum Hardware Connector
API · CORERun circuits on multiple quantum backends from one interface: IBM (live), IonQ (live), Quantinuum (partner), QuEra (analog). Small circuits automatically run on classical simulator.
10 / 10 SHIPPED · 226 / 226 TESTS GREEN · BUILD 286 · BIDIRECTIONAL HASH CHAIN
The Open-Model Wave
Open models are going everywhere.
Security has to travel with them.
The industry's own leaders say it: open models you can deploy anywhere are how intelligence gets democratized. Every open-weight release (Llama, Mistral, Qwen, Kimi, DeepSeek) creates more deployments, and every one of them ships without a security envelope.
We build the envelope that makes “anywhere” defensible, bring your own open-weights model, run it on hardware you control, scope-enforced, every action audited, with NIST-standardized post-quantum key protection at rest today and post-quantum transport on the roadmap. Your model. Your hardware. Your data, including ten years from now.
Why Matrix CR Studio
Hardware, not slides
We run real Shor-ECDLP circuits on IBM quantum hardware. Not threat models. Not vendor assessments. Not simulations.
Read more →
Null results count
We pre-register criteria before we run. If nothing breaks, we say so. Most firms assume the threat and sell the fix.
Read more →
72 hours to a finding
Enterprise PQC migrations run months. Our Quantum Threat Assessment delivers a prioritized, evidence-backed finding in 72 hours.
Read more →
You own the artifact
No control plane. No subscription to keep the lights on. Every deliverable ships as a standalone document you can act on independently.
Read more →
Small enough to care
The big vendors size for Vodafone and the US Air Force. We size for the regulated firm that needs an answer before the budget conversation.
Read more →Research Artifacts
240
kissing number verified
E8 Lattice Codec
VERIFIEDNearest-vector decoder for the densest lattice packing in 8 dimensions. Kissing number 240 verified. Coding gain 1.46→2.19 dB measured.
Read more →196,560
kissing number verified
Leech Lattice Codec
VERIFIEDGolay [24,12,8] → Leech construction. Kissing number 196,560 verified across all three minimal-vector families. Dim 24.
Read more →800-90
NIST SP A/B/C compliant
Quantum Entropy Reservoir
INTERNALNIST SP 800-90A/B/C CSPRNG seeded from real IBM quantum collapse events. SHAKE-256 conditioning. Consume-once pool. HMAC-DRBG output.
Read more →3
independent discriminators
Null-Test Framework
INTERNALThree-discriminator protocol for Shor-ECDLP claims. Pre-registered criteria. Every empirical claim tested against its own raw data before it enters any artifact.
Read more →Start Here
72 hours from kickoff
to a verified finding.
A scoped quantum threat assessment that tells you what breaks, what doesn't, and what to fix first. Delivered as a standalone document with raw data and a migration roadmap, no platform, no subscription. Remote-first, LATAM-native timezone.